Rivet connects the documents, conversations, approvals, workflow states, payments, and system records behind a business transaction — giving the right people on both sides a shared history they can understand and act on.
From the first document to final settlement, keep the evidence with the transaction.
Hover or tap any node to see its evidence. An editorial illustration of connected transaction history — not a product screenshot.
An accounting system is designed to record financial truth inside one company. But the reason a number changed usually lives somewhere else — in an order revision, an approval, a customer conversation, a shipment event, or a payment instruction. Rivet connects those events around the commercial transaction.
Correct, and silent about how it became true.
The record is not just the result. It is the evidence behind the result.
Rivet treats business objects as living parts of a relationship, not files detached from the work around them. Orders, invoices, approvals, messages, payments, and system events can remain connected through the life of the transaction.
A shared record should not require two companies to merge their systems or expose private data. Each organization connects Rivet to its own accounting or operating system and keeps control over its internal records, identifiers, permissions, and processes. Rivet coordinates the transaction context both sides are allowed to see.
Shared state is permissioned alignment, not unrestricted transparency.
When the transaction history stays connected, teams can move backward from an outcome to the evidence that produced it.
Follow the outcome back to the decision — and the decision back to the evidence.
Not every piece of information carries the same authority. Rivet's provenance model is designed to preserve the source behind important states — so when a document changes, a payment settles, or an AI answer appears, people can understand the evidence rather than treating every field as equally authoritative.
AI-generated conclusions stay distinguishable from verified states and link back to the records that support them.
Instead of interpreting one invoice or one email, Rivet Intelligence can work from permissioned transaction context: the relationship, current document, prior versions, approvals, messages, exceptions, payment state, and connected-system history.
The company eventually reconstructs the truth.
The answer was already there because the history never became disconnected.
One connected transaction improves visibility. A connected relationship creates institutional memory. A network of connected relationships shows how work and money actually move through the business.
The value is not more data. It is preserving the relationships between identity, intent, action, evidence, and settlement.
No. Accounting systems remain essential internal systems of record. The Connected Ledger describes the connected operational history around a transaction — the documents, conversations, workflow states, approvals, and payment events that explain how it progressed.
No. The product model is built around controlled organizational boundaries. Each side connects its own systems, and only the appropriate shared transaction state appears in the relationship workspace.
No. “Connected Ledger” describes the linked history of a transaction. Stablecoin settlement and future proof or identity capabilities are separate concepts.
It is complementary. Your existing systems stay your internal systems of record while Rivet coordinates the shared work and history between counterparties.
It gives intelligence permissioned context to reason over — source documents, versions, approvals, conversations, workflow states, and payment history — rather than interpreting an isolated file.
Give your teams and counterparties a connected history from the first document to final settlement.
Where business works together — and the history stays with the work.